The miller's youngest son set out to seek his fortune, accompanied only by his cat, Puss. After they had walked for several days, they noticed a royal cortege approaching, and Puss told the young man to undress and jump into a nearby river.
Puss then ran up to the King's coach, calling, "Help! Help! My master, the Marquis of Carabas, was bathing in the river, and robbers have stolen his clothes!"
The royal carriage stopped, and the King motioned to the young man to stand up in the water, which fortunately was deep enough to come up to his waist.
"Goodness!" exclaimed the princess,who was accompanying her father, "What a handsome young man!"
"That's as maybe", said the King, "But I don't think I've ever met the Marquis of Carabas. Do any of you know him?" he asked the courtiers. But it turned out that none of them had ever met such a person either.
"I must say", mused the Lord Chamberlain, "He doesn't strike me as being a nobleman. Look at his hair! Look at his hands! Now then", he said to the young man, "Can you name any nobleman who will vouch for you?"
But of course the miller's youngest son couldn't.
"He doesn't talk like a Marquis either!" was the Lord Chamberlain's verdict. "And if he is a Marquis, why does he choose to bathe in this muddy river? Hasn't he any lakes or streams on his estates?"
The King considered. "Now look here, my man", he pronounced eventually, "I've no idea who you are. We'll give you some clothes to make you decent, then you'd better be on your way. If you really are the Marquis of Carabas, then I apologise, but you surely understand we can't be too careful with strangers in these dangerous times".
So the Lord Chamberlain gave the miller's youngest son a set of clothes and a few coins, and warned him not to come near the King again.
"The cat, however, is a different matter", said the King. "Just fancy: a cat that talks! Would you like him as a pet, my dear?" he asked the princess.
"Oh, yes please daddy!" she exclaimed.
So the miller's youngest son walked disconsolately away, but Puss was taken to the palace, where he lived happily ever after.
Saturday, 15 August 2020
Friday, 10 July 2020
Visions
In his dreams he saw many strange and wonderful things, and when he woke he tried to turn his visions into poems, though he found that most escaped his memory soon afterwards. But as time progressed, and the drug increased its hold, his visions brought darkness amidst the beauty. He saw a pavilion, set in marvellous gardens above a river, but he knew it was doomed to destruction. He saw himself on a mountain peak near his friend’s home in the Lake District, and listened to the music of the bells ringing in the valleys below, but the songs the bells sang were songs of death. He saw a young bride entering the castle of her elderly widower husband, and she was very lovely, but her stepdaughter saw in her face the yellow unblinking eyes of a serpent. All these things he was tried to record, which helped to relieve his pain. Each time his apprehension increased, but he could not abandon his search now.
After a while, waking and dreaming seemed to merge, and he was left unsure which was which. Sometimes when he walked through the streets at night, plagued by the insomnia resulting from the opium, he thought he had found the wondrous city that he had so long sought, only it was no longer marvellous, but sinister and haunted. Evil lurked around every corner, watching him from a distance, just out of his sight, and the people he met (but could not speak to, nor did they speak to him) were not noble heroes and ravishing beauties, but ghosts, who wore the masks of death. He realised he was being punished for his temerity. His awareness of guilt deepened, until he came to feel he had committed a crime so monstrous, so horrible, that even he could not be told what it was. I have blasphemed against the gods, he thought: no, it is far worse than that: my crime somehow threatens the very basis of the universe; and my punishment will be like none that has ever existed before.
He only knew of one way which might allow him to escape from these horrors: he must set them out in a poem, which would tell of a man who is guilty of a terrible crime and justly suffers an equally terrible punishment, but is eventually redeemed by his suffering and pardoned. Such an ending would provide him with at least some hope of release. But what precise crime would the man in his poem have committed, since he could not know it himself? He consulted his closest friend; also a poet, but more down-to-earth in his ideas. And William pondered for a while, and then said, “I was reading the other day about a sailor who was marooned on a desert island by his shipmates, who were disgusted by the fact that he had shot an albatross. It appears that sailors regard this as a very wicked act, and also an extremely unlucky one”.
"Thank you, William", said Samuel, "I shall write the poem, and I shall call it 'The Ancient Mariner'"
After a while, waking and dreaming seemed to merge, and he was left unsure which was which. Sometimes when he walked through the streets at night, plagued by the insomnia resulting from the opium, he thought he had found the wondrous city that he had so long sought, only it was no longer marvellous, but sinister and haunted. Evil lurked around every corner, watching him from a distance, just out of his sight, and the people he met (but could not speak to, nor did they speak to him) were not noble heroes and ravishing beauties, but ghosts, who wore the masks of death. He realised he was being punished for his temerity. His awareness of guilt deepened, until he came to feel he had committed a crime so monstrous, so horrible, that even he could not be told what it was. I have blasphemed against the gods, he thought: no, it is far worse than that: my crime somehow threatens the very basis of the universe; and my punishment will be like none that has ever existed before.
He only knew of one way which might allow him to escape from these horrors: he must set them out in a poem, which would tell of a man who is guilty of a terrible crime and justly suffers an equally terrible punishment, but is eventually redeemed by his suffering and pardoned. Such an ending would provide him with at least some hope of release. But what precise crime would the man in his poem have committed, since he could not know it himself? He consulted his closest friend; also a poet, but more down-to-earth in his ideas. And William pondered for a while, and then said, “I was reading the other day about a sailor who was marooned on a desert island by his shipmates, who were disgusted by the fact that he had shot an albatross. It appears that sailors regard this as a very wicked act, and also an extremely unlucky one”.
"Thank you, William", said Samuel, "I shall write the poem, and I shall call it 'The Ancient Mariner'"
Monday, 16 March 2020
A Puzzle
I came away from the auction with a small box of Chinese bric-a-brac, which I had bid for because I liked the look of a piece of jade which formed one of the items. When I got it home, however, the jade turned out on closer inspection to be obviously modern, and not even very good quality at that; and I was relieved I hadn’t bid more.
Most of the other items in the box were frankly rubbish, but one or two attracted a second glance, if only to try to convince myself that my money hadn‘t been completely wasted. There was a carving in dark wood, beneath a glass dome smaller than a child’s fist, consisting of a man in a robe seated at a table. There was a teapot and a cup detached from the main carving and lying loose: probably the carving had been broken, but somehow it reminded me of those cheap little toys where you have to manoeuvre ball-bearings through a maze, or into slots in a picture. I even attempted to shake the dome to get these objects back onto the table, but failed miserably and gave up after a few goes.
At the bottom of the box was a medallion the size of a coin, on a chain. There were characters I couldn’t read on one side of it, and it surprised me, because I didn’t think it was the sort of thing the Chinese went in for. I suspected it wasn’t really Chinese at all, and I certainly didn’t find it at all attractive, but in an idle moment I hung it round my neck.
For some reason, I suddenly felt an overwhelming desire to return to the game, or whatever it was, under the glass dome. I shook it, and it took very little time or effort to get the cup and teapot into their right places on the table; but somehow they weren’t tiny any more: the whole carving had expanded until it was life-size, and I was right there beside it, watching. And the man in the robe was alive and moving. I watched as he poured himself a cup of tea, and then picked it up to drink it. And I realised that he mustn’t drink it, because the tea was poisoned; and I tried to shout at him not to, but no sound came out.The poison must have been very potent, because he collapsed almost immediately. And he realised what had happened to him, because he was able to lift his head from the table to look directly up at me, and his look said,
“YOU DID IT!”
Most of the other items in the box were frankly rubbish, but one or two attracted a second glance, if only to try to convince myself that my money hadn‘t been completely wasted. There was a carving in dark wood, beneath a glass dome smaller than a child’s fist, consisting of a man in a robe seated at a table. There was a teapot and a cup detached from the main carving and lying loose: probably the carving had been broken, but somehow it reminded me of those cheap little toys where you have to manoeuvre ball-bearings through a maze, or into slots in a picture. I even attempted to shake the dome to get these objects back onto the table, but failed miserably and gave up after a few goes.
At the bottom of the box was a medallion the size of a coin, on a chain. There were characters I couldn’t read on one side of it, and it surprised me, because I didn’t think it was the sort of thing the Chinese went in for. I suspected it wasn’t really Chinese at all, and I certainly didn’t find it at all attractive, but in an idle moment I hung it round my neck.
For some reason, I suddenly felt an overwhelming desire to return to the game, or whatever it was, under the glass dome. I shook it, and it took very little time or effort to get the cup and teapot into their right places on the table; but somehow they weren’t tiny any more: the whole carving had expanded until it was life-size, and I was right there beside it, watching. And the man in the robe was alive and moving. I watched as he poured himself a cup of tea, and then picked it up to drink it. And I realised that he mustn’t drink it, because the tea was poisoned; and I tried to shout at him not to, but no sound came out.The poison must have been very potent, because he collapsed almost immediately. And he realised what had happened to him, because he was able to lift his head from the table to look directly up at me, and his look said,
“YOU DID IT!”
Wednesday, 12 February 2020
A Beginning and an End
I have the opening and the concluding paragraphs of a story, but have yet to work out the middle!
Beginning:-
Until I inherited my parents' house and its contents, I had no idea that I had had a great-aunt Mildred. I wondered why her name had never been mentioned, and if it was her face that had been so savagely mutilated in the family photograph albums.
.
.
Conclusion:-
Some careful research in the local parish records enabled us to locate Mildred's grave,in a remote corner of the churchyard. It was marked by a plain slab that had become covered in ivy. When we cleared this away, we discovered a huge frog lurking underneath. I was relieved that it wasn't a toad.
Beginning:-
Until I inherited my parents' house and its contents, I had no idea that I had had a great-aunt Mildred. I wondered why her name had never been mentioned, and if it was her face that had been so savagely mutilated in the family photograph albums.
.
.
Conclusion:-
Some careful research in the local parish records enabled us to locate Mildred's grave,in a remote corner of the churchyard. It was marked by a plain slab that had become covered in ivy. When we cleared this away, we discovered a huge frog lurking underneath. I was relieved that it wasn't a toad.
Thursday, 9 January 2020
Blogs
They followed each other's blogs and social media entries, though they had never met and did not even correspond directly. Their works were completely different: he wrote little stories; fantasies for the most part, whereas she wrote about the small incidents of her daily life, in a wry and amusing fashion. He deduced from these that she was a university graduate, young and unmarried, who worked in a college library where there were plenty of old books. She had no idea who he might be, or how old he was.
Because of this lack of contact, they built up imaginary pictures of each other. She saw him as a would-be warrior against the forces of darkness; he saw her engaged in a quiet but unsuccessful search for love. And both were right.
They might have appeared to be opposites, but in the sight of God they were no more than opposite sides of the same coin: they complemented each other, and together formed a unity; for in their different ways they were searching for the same thing: the Absolute; the ultimate single Whole that is truth and love and everything.
Because of this lack of contact, they built up imaginary pictures of each other. She saw him as a would-be warrior against the forces of darkness; he saw her engaged in a quiet but unsuccessful search for love. And both were right.
They might have appeared to be opposites, but in the sight of God they were no more than opposite sides of the same coin: they complemented each other, and together formed a unity; for in their different ways they were searching for the same thing: the Absolute; the ultimate single Whole that is truth and love and everything.
Sunday, 22 December 2019
Wednesday, 4 December 2019
The Duel: an episode from my historical novel
(This is another chapter from my historical novel of the mid-18th century. Wilkes, Churchill and Sackville are genuine historical characters; the others are imaginary)
.............................................
One day when I entered
Child’s club I discovered Lord Staines in a state of great excitement. He
brandished a paper at me, and asked me whether I had read it. I saw it was a
magazine called the “North Briton”, which everyone knew to be written by John Wilkes,
Member of Parliament for Aylesbury. I had often read it with amusement, and
considered that it was a true friend of English liberty, though I had not yet
seen the most recent issue. Staines told me, with such fury that his hands
shook, that it contained a libellous attack upon him. When I took it from him
to read it, I saw that it suggested that he was the catamite of Lord George
Sackville, for whose sake, I recalled, he had resigned his commission in the
army. The names were spelt thus: Lord S*****s and Lord G****e S******e, but
anyone who was acquainted with public affairs would instantly know who was
meant. I told him that such low
degraded stuff was beneath his attention, and best ignored; and that I was sure
that his father would have given the same advice; but he said he had already
written to Mr Wilkes, the supposed author, demanding an apology; but having
received none, he was determined on a duel; so he had issued a challenge, and
wished me to be his second.
Accordingly, a few days later, immediately
after sunrise, we took a coach out to Putney Heath. It was a bright morning,
but cold. Dew lay heavy on the grass, and glittered on cobwebs on the bushes.
There was no-one in sight except our opponent and his second, and another man I
did not know, but was told he was one Doctor Blake, who was there in the event
of any serious injury.
It was my first sight of the celebrated Mr
Wilkes. He was well dressed and slender of build, but his face was disfigured
by the most violent squint, which caused his eyes to point in clean opposite
directions. He talked merrily, and appeared entirely unperturbed by the peril
of his situation. His second was a large, burly fellow; and I was astonished to
discover that under his cloak he wore a clergyman’s gown. I was informed that
this was the Reverend Charles Churchill, the popular poet who was said to be Mr
Wilkes’s assistant at the “North Briton”.
Doctor Blake then asked whether the two
gentlemen were determined to proceed with the duel. Lord Staines replied, with
no little heat, that his honour had been most grossly traduced, and that
nothing but the most profuse and abject apology would satisfy him. Mr Wilkes
appeared to make light of the whole matter. He said that Lord Staines could
produce no evidence that he, Wilkes, was the author of the offending article,
but having read it, his opinion was that it contained more than a grain of
truth; and, furthermore, since Lord Staines had seen fit publicly to dub him a
liar and a scoundrel, he was the one entitled to an apology. These words
angered Lord Staines even more, which was undoubtedly Wilkes’s intention.
A case was produced and opened, containing a
brace of very fine silver-mounted pistols. Churchill and I checked that they
were properly loaded. I attempted to hold my hands steady, lest I revealed my
fear by allowing them to shake: it was the first time I had ever witnessed a
duel.
Lord Staines and Mr Wilkes walked twelve
paces apart, then turned and presented their pistols. Lord Staines fired first,
and grazed his opponent’s coat, but did no further harm.
Mr Wilkes did not seemin the least perturbed by this narrow miss. He then levelled his pistol at Lord Staines's beast, and held it there for what appeared an age,with a glint in his eye. Staines, I was impressed to see, did not flinch, but stood motionless, regarding his opponent with a cold stare. At last Wilkes, with a laugh, deliberately fired at the ground, so that his bullet skipped across the earth
by Lord Staines’s feet. He then laughed and walked forward with his hand outstretched, congratulating Staines on his fine courage. Staines did not take the proffered hand, instead intending to reload and fire again; but Mr
Churchill announced that, in his decided opinion, sufficient satisfaction
had been given and that the business had been ended with perfect honour to both
parties. He proposed that we should all adjourn to a nearby tavern and drink
some wine. I agreed with this, and so did Doctor Blake; but Lord Staines said
this was no kind of apology, and, again refusing Wilkes’s hand, departed forthwith,
not even giving me a glance.
Doctor Blake did not stay long, but I
remained at the tavern with Wilkes and Churchill for the remainder of the
morning. I discovered Mr Wilkes to be the most engaging of companions. It was
not, I found, his first duel; for he had been challenged by Lord Talbot over a
previous article in the same magazine, and that too had passed without blood
being shed.
I saw much of him over the
next few months, and read the “North Briton” with great enjoyment...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)