(It is spring 1761; and Charles Huntingdon is visiting the Earl of Teesdale to discuss his prospects of being elected to Parliament)
It was a fine and sunny spring day as I
approached the Earl of Teesdale’s house at Maybury. My first sight was of two
immensely tall wrought iron gates with elaborate traceries of tendrils, flowers
and leaves. At either side large stone eagles on pedestals did duty as sentries.
The gates were shut, but no sooner had my carriage drawn up than two servants
dressed in green emerged from an adjacent lodge cottage, threw open the gates and
saluted us smartly when I gave them my name. I then passed along a
neatly-gravelled drive that curved through trees until I beheld a splendid
mansion of red brick, crowned with a low balustrade of white stone. Robert
jumped off the carriage and was assisted by a giant footman and a boy in unloading
my boxes and bags.
(The gates at Chirk castle, Wales)
I was conducted into the entrance hall,
which had a remarkable floor squares of white marble alternating with black
slate. There were tall cabinets containing fine porcelain. From there an
immense staircase, also of marble with a delicate wrought iron balustrade,
swept upwards. Here the Earl welcomed me warmly and, after introducing me to
other guests, said the Countess would be delighted to see me again, and suggested
I should walk out onto the terrace to meet her.
I
passed through the house, and found Lady Teesdale seated under a parasol with a
book of poetry in her hand. Beside her was a lady of about my age, who also had
a book, though hers lay open and face down on the ground beside her, while she
gave her full attention to a small dog on her lap. I hastened to pay my
compliments to the Countess and enquire about her health. In return she said
she was very pleased to see me again, hoped my journey had been free of
trouble, and introduced me to the younger woman, who was Lady Graham, her
daughter. That personage, without bothering to raise her eyes, spared a hand
from stroking her lapdog and languidly presented it for me to kiss. The dog
uttered a feeble little snarl at this unwonted interruption to its mistress’s
attention.
I
said that the terrace garden was most beautiful, as indeed it was. Flagstones surrounded
a central pool, with a statue of Neptune at its centre, played upon by
fountains. There were geometrically shaped flowerbeds with yew bushes trimmed
into cones or cubes, and large urns mounted on plinths. At the far side was a
low balustrade. The Countess rose and took my arm to show me the view. Her
daughter remained seated.
Beyond the terrace the land fell away into a
valley with fields and woodland. Over to the right was a small village with a
stream and a little old church. A slight mist, through which distant hills
could be perceived indistinctly, would have made the scene charming, but for
the fact that as far as the eye could see the fields swarmed with armies of labourers.
They were toiling away but they were not cultivating the soil. Some were
digging a vast pit, long and serpentine in shape, from which others carted the
soil away to pile it some distance off, and yet more workmen led teams of
horses or oxen dragging trees to be planted in their new homes. Great scars ran
across the land showed where hedges had been grubbed up and buildings
demolished, and there were huge piles of stone and brick from demolished
buildings. In the midst of this chaos I noticed a group of men unrolling and
consulting plans.
“I must own, Mr Huntingdon”, said Lady
Teesdale as she stood at my side viewing the scene, “that I was happy with the
gardens as they were. But my lord was insistent on change, so he called in the
famous Mr Brown. He surveyed our lands and told us that he saw “capabilities of
improvement”. I suspect he says that to everyone, in order to get employment. Those
are Brown’s men down below us, all working like so many ants. Where they are
digging will be a lake, into which our stream will be diverted. The soil dug
out will be formed into a mound, on which will stand a temple in the Corinthian
style, surrounded by clumps of trees. The village will have to go, of course,
and where it now stands there will be an orangerie in the form of a Roman
arcade. The church will remain, but will be allowed to decay into a romantic
ruin. A new village and church will be built, well out of sight.”
I wondered whether I should consult Mr Brown
with a view to the improvement of my garden, but reflected that he might
dismiss so small a project as beneath his attention.
Lady Teesdale then sighed deeply, then said,
“I wish my daughter took more interest in the work. It is, after all, only her
children who will be able to judge the true results Mr Brown’s labours, and the
expenditure of her father’s money in bringing them about. All I can see now is
mud, and an outlook resembling a battlefield, and am likely to see but little else
before my death”.
I was shocked by the sad tone in which she
spoke these last words, but could only mutter a feeble hope that she still had
many years still ahead of her. She did not respond as we walked back to her
chair, where we discovered that her daughter had apparently not moved.
“Maria!” Lady Teesdale commanded with sudden
asperity, “Get up and show our guest the house!”
With evident reluctance the young lady so
addressed rose to her feet. She deposited her lapdog on the chair she had
occupied, instructed Poppy (for such was the creature’s name) on no account to
move, and honoured me with no more than a single hostile glance before she
turned to lead the way. Without a word she brought me to a room that was
evidently the library, where we found an elderly gentleman in clerical garb.
“Lunford!” she hailed him, in a voice that
was meant to be commanding, but which merely sounded whining and peevish, “My
mother requires you to conduct Mr Huntingdon here round our house!” This of
course was not truthful, but the young lady clearly considered that she had
done everything that duty required, and without bothering to introduce me in a
proper fashion she retired back to her chair on the terrace and to Poppy. I
recalled that Lord Teesdale had dismissed his daughter and her husband as
“fools”. I had already formed my opinion of the daughter, and wondered what I
would make of her husband.
Lunford, by contrast, seemed pleased to meet
me when I introduced myself, and said he would be delighted to have the
opportunity to show me the principal rooms. So I was taken to the chapel, which
had been painted with murals by Thornhill some forty years earlier, and the
dining room that was the work of James Gibbs. The room I most admired was light and airy,
furnished with delicate chairs and small tables in the Chinese style, with a
patterned wallpaper of pale green and gold. The family portraits were in the
dining room with a three-quarter-length portrait of the Earl himself, by Allan
Ramsay and a matching one of the Countess. Mr Lunford also drew my attention to
great swags of lime-wood, carved into fruit and flowers by what he hailed as “the
chisel of the immortal Grinling Gibbons”. I sensed that he took an immense
pride in the mansion in which he was employed, almost as great as if it had
been his own.
I looked for paintings of the couple’s
children, but none were to be seen, other than a family group with three
infants, all dressed, for some reason, in the clothes of the previous century. Instead
my attention was directed to a portrait of a man wearing red robes and a
full-bottomed wig: the Earl’s
grandfather, a lawyer and Member of Parliament who had become a distinguished
judge, founded the family fortunes and was raised to the peerage as a Baron.
We passed next to a painting by Sir Godfrey
Kneller of a man in military uniform with his hand resting on his sword hilt, with
behind him a scene of battle, with red-coated soldiers advancing.
“This is the judge’s son, and the father of
the present Earl. He fought in the Duke of Marlborough’s wars, and rose to the
rank of colonel. He was gravely wounded at the battle of Ramillies. He then entered
Parliament and married an heiress; through her coming into possession of this
house. She was descended from an earlier Earl of Teesdale, and the title was
revived for him in consequence of his staunch support of Sir Robert Walpole and
the Whig party.”
He continued to talk at some length on the
beauties of the house. I began to suspect that Lunford was a tedious fellow; the
male equivalent of Mrs Waring, if such a grotesque notion was possible. My
attention wandered as I imagined a contest between Lunford and my librarian Mrs
Warner as to who could speak longest without stopping. Eventually I contrived
to turn the talk on other subjects. I found that he, like me, was a Cambridge
man, the son of a vicar in Wiltshire: he had first been employed as a tutor to
the Earl’s sons, teaching them the rudiments of Latin and Greek before they
were sent away to school, and worked for Lord Teesdale as librarian, keeper of
muniments and occasional secretary. He praised the good nature and kindness of
the Countess, but was more guarded on the subject of the Earl, and absolutely
refused to be drawn when asked about their offspring, beyond saying that Lord
Staines seldom visited Maybury. He was most interested when I mentioned my
aunt, for he had read her pieces in the “Gentleman’s Magazine”, and had not
been aware that they were written by a woman. This led him to lament the
current lack of educated females when compared with earlier times. And so we
parted on good terms, though I was glad of a period of silence afterwards.
The dinners at Maybury were lavish. The
table was of mahogany, and long enough to seat all the prominent gentlemen of
the county and their ladies. There was plentiful venison and wildfowl, along
with hams and pies of all kinds, and Lord Teesdale, like Sir James Wilbrahim,
proudly told me how much of the food had been produced on his own estates. I
doubted, however, whether Sir James would have approved of preparation of the
food, for Lord Teesdale had brought his French chef from London to supervise
the kitchen.
Other guests continued to arrive over the
next few days. I was introduced to the two Members of Parliament for the
county, together with their ladies. Sir Anthony Pardington and Richard
Braithwaite were of opposite parties: the one was a Whig, the other a Tory.
Indeed, they were different from each other in every way. Sir Anthony was in
his forties, and had his estates in the south of the county, whereas Mr
Braithwaite was much older, and his lands extended into Lancashire, and even into
Cumberland and Westmorland, though he lived part of the year in Surrey. Again, Sir
Anthony was short and energetic and spoke freely on all subjects, never failing
to amuse and entertain his listeners: Mr Braithwaite was tall, dark and
generally silent, but when he did speak his experience and wisdom were always
respected. The ladies resembled their husbands, for Lady Pardington was small
and lively, dressed very smartly in blue and gold and perpetually bubbling with
amusing chatter, but Mrs Braithwaite maintained an atmosphere of immense
dignity, ate sparingly and seldom if ever spoke.
Both these gentlemen valued their
independence from any Party obligations. It was known that Sir Anthony had
twice rejected the offer of ministerial office. Despite their political
differences they had an arrangement to co-operate with each other in elections: in
consequence of which they had together been returned unopposed at the last contest,
and looked to do the same again.
Both spoke to me with great politeness. They
were optimistic about my prospects in Bereton in the forthcoming election and
promised me that any influence they might have in the borough would be used on
my behalf. When in return I assured each of them of any support I could give
them in their campaigns, I felt myself a person of importance!
Sir
Anthony pressed me to visit his favourite summer residence, which he said could
be reached in an easy day’s ride from Bearsclough. He was a great sportsman, with
a particular love of prize-fighting and shooting, and I was forced to admit I
was wholly without knowledge of either of these. Mr Braithwaite’s passion was
for cricket. He maintained a team at his Surrey home, and promised that if I
ever wanted a game, he would include me for one of his matches against other
gentlemen’s teams.
Among the younger guests was Lord Teesdale’s
son-in-law: Sir Headley Graham, a Baronet: the heir to vast estates in the
north-east on either side of the Scottish border, though he spent most of his
time at his house in Berkshire. I had already perceived the justice of the Earl’s
opinion of his daughter, and I now quickly came to a similar verdict on the
son-in-law. His talk was mostly of horse-racing, to which conversation I could
contribute nothing. On one occasion our discourse turned to art, but once he
established that not only had I not visited Florence or Venice, but had never
even set foot out of England, he treated me in the most supercilious manner, as
if my opinions on this or any other subject could not possibly be of any value.
When I mentioned that I hoped to be elected to Parliament, he replied that he would
shortly be elected too, but he feared that it would be “a deuced bore”. After
being obliged to listen to his conversation I decided that I much preferred the
company of the two Members of Parliament.
When the gentlemen sat together after dinner,
the talk continued long into the night: of country affairs and the problems of
their estates, but also of politics. Our host was the only person present who
had met and talked with the new young King, though all of us had heard
different rumours and we were all eager to learn the truth.
Graham’s contribution was to say at this point,
“I’ve heard it said that he is remarkably stupid!” I thought that this was a
most ludicrous comment coming from him, and I found that his father-in-law was
in agreement with me, for Lord Teesdale turned on him.
“That, sir, is entirely untrue!” he replied
with some asperity, “I have had the honour of speaking with His Majesty, and I
can assure you he knows far more than certain other young men of his age. Where
he is deficient, if I may say so, is in political understanding, and for that I
must blame his grandfather’s neglect. Since boyhood, the Prince was surrounded
by men from the Opposition, and in consequence he has been led to believe that
our whole system of government is entirely corrupt …”
“Which of course it is”, Mr Braithwaite
commented. Lord Teesdale ignored this intervention, and continued,
“… and he desires to bring about a total
reformation. The consequences of such a prejudice cannot yet be foreseen, but the
election now about to take place will be organised by the Duke of Newcastle, as
every election has been for the past thirty years or more, and I am sure he
will be satisfied with the results.”
I told
the company of the letter I had received from the Duke, and how surprised I was
that he should think my campaign at Bereton a matter of importance to him. Mr
Braithwaite answered me, with contempt in his voice that he made no attempt to
conceal, that the Duke had always been a fool, but that now he was an old fool.
He held forth on the Duke’s ineptitude in office, saying, “He was for thirty
years a Secretary of State without the least trace of intelligence. Future
generations, I am sure, will be astonished that such a person should have
remained in power for so long. It was wholly due to his foolishness that we
fell into the present war in such a disastrous condition.”
Most of those present nodded their heads in
agreement, and an elderly gentleman, whose name I forget, intervened to inform
us, “Lord Wilmington once said that the Duke of Newcastle always loses half an
hour in the morning, which he is running after the rest of the day without
being able to overtake it”.
Everyone laughed, after which Mr Braithwaite
resumed his Philippic. “In 1756, after the disastrous start to the war, the Duke
retired to his house at Claremont, where for about a fortnight, at the age of
past sixty, he played at being a country gentleman and a sportsman! But,
getting wet in his feet, he hurried back to London in a fright, and the country
was once again blessed with his assistance.”
Sir Anthony interposed. “None would dispute
Mr Pitt’s genius in his conduct of the war”, he said, “But Pitt was to a large
extent imposed on the King by the clamour of the people, and Pitt did not
command the numbers in Parliament; nor did he have any grasp of the finances.
So it was arranged that he and the Duke would work together to save the
country. Pitt would provide the magnificent war strategies, and leave the Duke
to find the equally magnificent means required to carry them out. And this
grand coalition has served the country well; for we are victorious on all
fronts, and for the past four years there has been no formed opposition in
Parliament.”
The Earl then summed up the discussion most
judiciously, saying that, as things stood, he thought it best that the existing
ministers should continue in office, with some place being found for the Earl
of Bute, as the particular friend of our new King; and that, speaking for
himself he did not expect to see any resignations or dismissals as long as Pitt
and the Duke were able to work together.
“The last time I was in London I was visited
in my home by two pestiferous Quakers, a man and a woman, who prated at length,
and in the most wearisome fashion, about the evils of slavery. Having listened
to them patiently, I told them that my slaves, so long as they worked honestly
and did not rise in revolt, would receive food and fair treatment, for I had
instructed my overseers accordingly, and indeed, what more could the poor
heathen savages expect? They asked whether I had ever ventured there to find
whether my orders were being obeyed? I told them, of course not; but my
information was that deaths on my plantations were considerably lower than on
neighbouring ones. After that they departed, and I instructed my butler that on
no account should such persons in future be admitted.”
I wondered whether I myself had any
investments in the West Indies or in the sugar trade: I could not recall
whether Clifford had told me anything on the subject, and I vowed to research
among my aunt’s papers to see if I could discover more.
I asked about the prospects for a peace. I
was told that envoys had been sent to Paris to explore whether a treaty could
be negotiated soon, but Lord Teesdale doubted whether it would meet with any
success.
“For”, he said, “Pitt wishes to destroy the
French empire so completely and utterly that it will never threaten this again.
He will never make any concessions over the West Indies, or anywhere else. Then
there is the question of Frederick of Prussia, whose situation is most
perilous. Pitt will never abandon him. Therefore I do not expect any peace
agreement this year”.
Mr Braithwaite shook his head sadly, and
asked whether the war would then continue until our nation was wholly bankrupt?
He did not receive an answer.
Afterwards I asked Sir Anthony Pardington
why Mr Braithwaite had been invited to Maybury, since it appeared that on all
questions he differed absolutely from Lord Teesdale. He laughed and replied
that Lord Teesdale always wished to have friends in all parties in case there
should be changes in the ministry. Mr Braithwaite, he assured me, was an honest
old Tory but certainly never a Jacobite.
The
Countess presided at the dinner table with her husband, but said very little;
and in the afternoons the ladies formed their own society, where they sipped tea
from delicate Meissen bowls. On more than one occasion she graciously invited
me to attend their gatherings, where I was the only man present. I did my best
to follow Elizabeth’s advice on how to conduct myself. I mentioned my hope of
being elected to Parliament, but quickly sensed that none of these ladies were
greatly interested in political matters. Instead they discussed the works of
various novelists and poets; few of whom I had read, though thanks to
Elizabeth’s guidance I had at least heard of them and knew something of their
work and reputations.
Lady
Pardington chattered merrily away whatever the subject, but it was Mrs Braithwaite
who was treated as the ultimate oracular authority on all matters of taste. Maria
attended only once, presumably at the command of her mother, and without Poppy.
She plainly considered the discussions a great bore: she contributed nothing
and yawned quite openly. Finally the Countess relented and permitted her to withdraw.
The errant daughter then left hastily and with ill grace but greatly to the
relief of the company.
The
ladies asked me many questions about my history and my new home. I recounted a
few tales of the small doings of Bearsclough and Bereton, and of my meetings
with Miss Louisa Wilbrahim. They requested more information about her, and from
my description unanimously proclaimed that she must be without doubt a most
charming girl, and that they would be delighted to meet her. Lady Teesdale was
of the opinion that she would make someone an excellent wife, but added,
sentimentally, that it was a pity that she could not remain at her present
innocent age for ever. No-one ever made any reference to the Countess’s son who
had died, and I was careful not to broach the subject myself.
I had an important discussion on the political situation in Bereton with Oswald Jarrett, Lord Teesdale’s attorney, man of business, election agent and general factotum. Mr Lunford assisted him by producing relevant documents, and together they sought to provide me with full details of my prospects of success in the election. Lunford began the instruction by recounting what he announced would be a very brief history of the borough, since Henry VIII first granted it the right to elect two Members to the House of Commons. This would no doubt have been greatly interesting to an historian, though “brief” was perhaps not the adjective I would have chosen for his discourse.
Jarrett then gave a survey of the voters of
Bereton, who would shortly be determining my future. They were the freemen of
the borough; landowners, officeholders, the better-off tradesmen and others,
each man having two votes. By his reckoning there were about fifty of them, though
several resided a distance away, and might recently have died. He enquired
whether I had been sworn in as a freeman, and on hearing I had not, advised me
to do this immediately.
I was then provided with a survey of many of
those freemen: this man would always follow the lead of Sir James Wilbrahim,
that man was my tenant and would vote according to my instructions; a third man
held a post in the Excise and so would vote for any candidate supported by the
ministry; a certain man was rich and independent, whereas another was utterly
venal and would sell his vote to whoever paid highest; and so on and so forth
until my mind was quite bewildered. I hoped that Clifford would already be
familiar with much of this information.
Above all, Jarrett advised, I must stay
close to Sir James Wilbrahim, who carried much weight in the borough. I mentioned the letter from the Duke of
Newcastle, but was told that it would be best, at this stage, to mention the
letter only to those who might support the present ministry. For myself, I
should write to the Duke with fulsome promises of support, and hint that some
money forthcoming from him would be much appreciated. Otherwise it was up to me
to spend my money freely but wisely. If all went well, Jarrett thought, I might
be returned without the trouble and expense of a poll.
A broad hint was given that, should I find
the cost of the campaign to be beyond my means, Lord Teesdale would be happy to
lend me the necessary funds, provided I would promise to vote according to his
wishes when requested. I returned a suitably conciliatory answer, hoping that
the necessity would not arise.
The Earl’s parting words to me were,
“Should you be successful in your attempt to enter Parliament, l would hope
that you follow my guidance in any question that directly affects my interests;
but otherwise you may pursue your own course as you see fit. And let me give
you a word to remember: canals! They are the future! If you have money, invest
it there! I expect to see Bills on the building of canals debated in the new
Parliament. If you are indeed elected, vote for them! You will assuredly not
regret it!”
Well then: I would vote for any Enclosure
Bill or Canal Bill that emanated from his lordship, but otherwise I would pilot
my own course.
Robert the valet had not exchanged a word
with me, beyond those required when helping me dress, during our stay at
Maybury, and he remained silent during our return journey. Eventually I broke
this silence by thanking him for his flawless service and producing half a
guinea from my purse and holding it just above his hand as I encouraged him to
speak freely on what he had learned at Lord Teesdale’s home. There was a pause
while Robert wrestled with his conscience, but the struggle did not last long.
Soon he took the proffered gold and spoke.
“His lordship keeps a very fine
establishment”, he began, cautiously, “And her ladyship the Countess is deeply
loved by all: they worship the ground she walks on, they do. They all say as
how they couldn’t wish for a kinder mistress. Many a story they’ve told me of
her generosity and help to those in distress. And she likes you, sir. George,
he’s one of the footmen, heard her say she wished you was her son!”
“And Lord Staines? What of him?”
“Ah: the young master comes to the house but
seldom, and when he does, then it’s bad times. There’s always angry disputes
between him and his father, and he takes it out on the servants. Everyone is
greatly relieved when he returns to London”.
“And what about the Earl himself? What did
you learn about him?”
Robert was reluctant to speak any further,
but after a while he continued.
“Well, sir, I didn’t hear nothing against
his lordship himself. He leaves much of the business of the estate in the hands
of his agent, that Mr Jarrett, and he’s not well liked. He’s a hard taskmaster,
they all say, and not regular with giving the servants their wages. They may go
months or even years without pay, but none don’t dare complain for fear of
dismissal, because his lordship always takes Mr Jarrett’s advice on such things.
It’s a rich household, sir, but not a happy one; that it’s not”.
This made me glad that I had paid all the
servants their vails (as these were named) when I left, since perhaps they were
dependent on these for their livelihood, with their wages so much in arrears. At
least it might assure me good service should I return. But then Robert, after
furtively glancing around as if he feared someone might be listening,
whispered, “Some of them do say that Mr Jarrett is pocketing his lordship’s
money for himself. But I don’t know nothing about that!”
I was careful to show no reaction to all
this of information, but I filed it away in my mind. Silence then resumed for
the rest of our journey, for I was thinking of my campaign for election;
turning over and over in my mind an address I would deliver:
“To the free and independent voters of
Bereton – or should that be “citizens”? – To the free etc etc of the ancient
and loyal borough of Bereton – or would this resurrect the Jacobite question?”
and so on endlessly.
I would soon discover whether my words had the
desired effect.